Baretti LECTURES ON QUANTUM MECHANICS
by Reinaldo Baretti Machín (reibaretti2004@yahoo.com)
Chapter 8 -
The hydrogen atomLectures on Quantum Mechanics -Introduction
Chapter 1 - Some experimental facts
Chapter 2 - The Old Quantum theory
Chapter 3 - The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics
Chapter 6 - Periodic Potentials
Chapter 8 - The Hydrogen AtomChapter 9 - The electron spin
Chapter 10 -The two electron atom
FREE DOWNLOAD FORTRAN-FORCE 2.0.8
References:
1. Principles of quantum mechanics; nonrelativistic wave mechanics with illustrative applications.
2. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics with Applications to Chemistry by Linus Pauling and E. Bright Wilson Jr.
3. Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory, Volume 3, Third Edition (Quantum Mechanics) by L. D. Landau and L. M. Lifshitz
4. Applied mathematics for engineers and physicists , by Louis Albert Pipes
5. Theoretical physics by A. S Kompaneets
6. Classical Mechanics by Herbert Goldstein
7. Wikipedia
Curvilinear coordinates ,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curvilinear_coordinates
8.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associated_Legendre_function
9.
Fundamentals of Modern Physics - Hardcover (Jun
1961) by Robert Martin Eisberg, Chapter 10.
10.
http://www.sagenb.org/doc/live/reference/sage/calculus/functional.html The nuclei and the electron constitute a two particle
system. Since the electron has a much smaller mass than
the nuclei and the problem can be cast as one particle
system of reduced mass μ moving around the center of
force and a free translation of the atom.
Let the nuclei has mass m1 and position (x1
, y1 , z1 ) and the electron
has a mass m2 and position
( x2, y2 ,z2) .
We know that
m2 << m1 therefore the
motion can be viewed as that of the electron over a
fixed nuclei. The potential energy is U(r) = - k
e2 /r where r = ( (x1-x2)2
+ (y1-y2)2 +(z1-z2)2
)1/2 .
To show how the
center mass motion separates from the relative motion ,
consider the simpler case of one dimensional motion with
the center
mass position defined by
xcm = (m1 x1 + m2
x2)/( m1 + m2)
= (m1 x1 + m2 x2)/
M , M= m 1+m2
. (1)
The relative
separation is
r = x2 - x 1
. (2)
The kinetic energy
operator has the form
Koperator = - (h'2
/2 ) {(1/m1 ) ∂2 /∂x12
+ (1/ m2 )∂2
/∂x22 }
. (3)
But
∂ /∂x1 =
(∂ xcm /∂x1) ∂/∂xcm
+ (∂ r /∂x1)
∂/∂r
=
(m1 /M)∂/∂xcm -
∂/∂r
, (4)
and
∂ /∂x2 = ( m2 /M) ∂/∂xcm + ∂/∂r . (5)
Using (3) and (4) one gets
(1/m1 ) ∂2 /∂x12 = { (m1/M2) (∂2 /∂xcm2 ) - (2/M) ∂2 /∂x cm ∂r +(1/m1)∂2 /∂r2 } , (6)
(1/m2 ) ∂2 /∂x22 = { (m2/M2) (∂2 /∂xcm2 ) + (2/M) ∂2 /∂x cm ∂r +(1/m2)∂2 /∂r2 } . (7)
Substitution of (6)-(7) in (3) gives two terms
Koperator = - (h'2 /2 ) {(1/M ) ∂2 /∂xcm2 + (1/ μ )∂2 /∂r 2 } , (8)
where μ = m1 m2 /(m1 + m2) is the reduced mass . If m1 >> m2 , μ ≈ m2 , the electron mass.
Let the total wave function be Ψtotal = F(xcm) Ψ(r) . The resultant wave equation is
(1/M ) Ψ(r) ∂2 F(xcm) /∂xcm2 + F(xcm)(1/ μ )∂2 Ψ(r) /∂r 2
+ 2( Etotal - U(r) ) F(xcm) Ψ(r) = 0 . (9)
Let Etotal = Etranalation + E and by separation of variables ,we have
(1/M ) ∂2 F(xcm) /∂xcm2 = -2 Etranslation F(xcm ) (10)
and the equation of interest is
(1/ μ )∂2 Ψ(r) /∂r 2 = -2 ( E - U(r) ) Ψ(r) . (11)
If we go to three dimensions , in spherical coordinates ,( r,θ, φ) eq. (11) goes over into
( ∂2 /∂r2 +(2/r) ∂ /∂r ) Ψ ( r,θ, φ )
+ {(1/r2 ) {∂2 /∂ θ2 + cotθ ∂/∂ θ + (1/ sin2θ ) ∂2 /∂φ2 } Ψ ( r,θ, φ )
= -2 μ (E - U(r) ) Ψ ( r,θ, φ ) . (12)It was shown in chapter 7 that the angular part has solutions
-{∂2 /∂ θ2 + cotθ ∂/∂ θ + (1/ sin2θ ) ∂2 /∂φ2 } Yl,m (θ ,φ )
= L2 Yl,m (θ ,φ ) = l(l+1) Yl,m (θ ,φ ) . (13)
Substitution of Ψ ( r,θ, φ ) = R(r) Yl,m (θ ,φ ) in (12) gives,
( ∂2 /∂r2 +(2/r) ∂ /∂r )
R( r) - l(l+1) R(r) /r2 = -2 μ (E - U(r) ) R (r) . (14)We will solve (14) numerically.
The units and scales of magnitudes have to be established. Take the reduced mass μ =1 and as always h' (h bar)=1.
The coulombic potential energy is
U(r)= -kZe2/r .(15)
Set the factors k Z e2 =1 .
scale factors the scale of length Ls is obtained using (h'2/ μ ) (1/ Ls2 ) ≡ kZe2/ Ls (see the Introduction chapter)
Ls = {h'2/ (μ kZe2) } (16)
The scale of energy is obtained from h'2 / (μ Ls2 ) = Es . Therefore
Es = ke2 /Ls . (17)
In the introduction we calculated to three digits these scales. but there we used m=9.11E-31 kg , whereas now we must employ
the reduced mass,
μ = (me mproton ) /( me + mproton ) . Let mproton = 1.67E-27 kg , then
μ = 9.105E-31 kg .
So to three digits we may still employ the former calculations,
Ls = 5.29E-011 meters , Es = 4.36E-018 joules = 27.2 eV .
The asymptotic form of R(r) is obtained from (14) making r→ ∞ .
d 2R /dr2 = -2 E R = 2/E/ R ≡ k2 R . The physical solution must have -kr = -(2/E/)1/2 r , as the argument of the exponetial.
Thus
lim R r→ ∞ = exp {- (2/E/) 1/2 r } . (17)
It was shown in chapter 2, that the absolute value of the n-th quantized state had a dependency
En ~ n2α/(2+α) on the quantum number n, if the potential energy had the form U ~ rα .
For the coulombic potential α = -1 and En ~ - 1/n2 . The energy must be negative to have a bound state. Moreover from chapter 2 eq (9) ,
En = -(1/2) (1/n2) . So
lim R r→ ∞ = exp {- r /n } where n is a quantum number equal to 1,2,3....
Our numerical results will justify such assertion.
Another limit to be examined is when r→0 .
As r→ 0 let R~ rs .The right hand side of (14) is of the order of U rs ~ rs-1. Meanwhile the left side of the equation has three terms
proportional to rs-2 .
They are { s(s-1) +2 s - l (l+1) } rs-2 .
The coefficient is equated to zero
s(s-1) +2 s - l (l+1) = 0 , and the solutions are s= l , s = -(l +1) . Only the positive power , s= l ,can have physical meaning.
One concludes that near the origin the wave function has the form , R ~ r l .
This leads to the following IC at the origin ,
R (0) =1 , d R(0)/dr = 0 , when l =0 , (18)
R(0)=0 ,d R(0)/dr = 1 , if l = 1
R(0)=0 ,d R(0)/dr = 0 , if l > 1 .
The difference equation solution to (14) is (setting μ = 1) ,
Rn = 2 Rn-1 - Rn-2 + ( ∆r )2 { -(2/rn-1) (Rn-1 -Rn-2 )/∆r + l(l+1) Rn-1 /( rn-1)2
-2 (E - U(rn-1 ) ) Rn-1 } , (19)
where rn = n ∆r .
The following run has the energy running from -.6 au to -.0407 au. Equation (19) is integrated ,for each energy value,well into the classically forbidden region where E < U(r). The asymptotic sign given by Ψ(rfinal) / abs( Ψ(rfinal) changes value when the equation goes through an energy eigenvalue. From the run we see that the first three eigenvalues with quantum numbers (l=0, m=0) are,
-.505 < E 1 < -.496 . (20)
-.126 < E 2 < -.117
-.597 < E 3 < -.0502
This of course matches perfectly well with our expectation that En ~ -1/n2 . We see that En = -1/(2n2) is the correct formula , for
E1 = -.5 ; E2 = -.125 , E3 = -.0556 .
RUN
enter atomic number
1.
atomic number, ang momentum 1. 0.
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.600E+00 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.591E+00 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.581E+00 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.572E+00 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.562E+00 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.553E+00 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.543E+00 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.534E+00 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.524E+00 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.515E+00 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.505E+00 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.496E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.486E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.477E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.467E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.458E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.448E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.439E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.429E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.420E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.410E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.401E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.391E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.382E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.373E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.363E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.354E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.344E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.335E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.325E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.316E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.306E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.297E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.287E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.278E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.268E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.259E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.249E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.240E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.230E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.221E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.211E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.202E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.192E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.183E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.173E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.164E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.154E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.145E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.136E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.126E+00 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.117E+00 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.107E+00 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.976E-01 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.881E-01 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.786E-01 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.692E-01 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.597E-01 0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.502E-01 -0.100E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.407E-01 -0.100E+01
more ? =1 another run , =0 no more
********
If we run the program again with a very small spread in the energy say , from -.49 to -.51 , the exact energy can be pinpointed.
Here the number of steps - nstep- was increased to 5000 and xlim=3.5*Z/abs(E).
energy, psif/abs(psif)=
-0.498571E+00 -0.100000E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.498857E+00 -0.100000E+01
energy, psif/abs(psif)= -0.499143E+00 0.100000E+01
The estimate of E is now -.49895 au .

Fig 2. Hydrogenic ground state wave function. It is a decaying exponential.
We write for the ground state Ψn=1, l = 0 ,m=0 = N exp(-r) . It has to be normalized integrating its square over all space
∫ Ψ 2 r2 dr dΩ =1 , where the solid angle differential is dΩ = sin(θ) dθ dφ . This gives
N2 4 π ∫ exp(-2r) r2 dr = N2 π =1 ,
and therefore N = 1/π1/2 . The normalized ground state hydrogenic wave function is
Ψ1, 0 ,0 = (1/ π1/2 ) exp(-r) . (21)
It may well happen that the choice of unit length may not include the factor Z ,like the length scale in (16).
Then the distance radial distance say u =h'2/ (μ ke2) } is to our r as
u / r = Z
Then exp(-u) = exp(-Zr) , dr = du/Z , r 2 = (u2/Z2) .
The normalization becomes N2 ∫ exp(-2Zr) 4π(r2) dr =N2 ∫ exp(-2u) 4π(u2/Z2) du/Z = 1;
or N2 π/Z3 = 1 , thus N= (Z3 / π)1/2 .
Eq (21) may be written as Ψ1, 0 ,0 = (Z3/ π )1/2 exp(-Zr) with the understanding that the definition of the scale of length does not include the atomic number Z.
FORTRAN # 8.1 - code for hydrogenic wave functions
c Hydrogenic atom 8 de octubre 2009
equivalence (dx,h)
dimension psi(0:10000) ,psinf(300),energy(300)
v(x)= -Z/x
g(x,i)=-2.*(e- v(x))*psi(i)+
$ al*(al+1.)*psi(i)/x**2
135 print*,' enter atomic number '
read*,Z
e=-.6*Z**2
c input angular momentum quantum number = al
al=0.
efinal= -z**2/(2.*4.**2)
nstep=1000
niter=60
de=(efinal-e)/float(niter)
c escale=27.2109
escale=1.
c print*,'escale,e=',escale,e
print*,'atomic number, ang momentum',z,al
print*,' '
do 110 iter=1,niter
xlim=3.0*Z/abs(e)
dx=xlim/float(nstep)
c xlim should go beyond the classical turning point where e=V(x)
c initial condtions psi(x)=x**al , psi'(x)= al*x**(al-1.)
c for al=0. psi(0)=1. psi(1)=psi(0)-dx
if(al.eq.0.)then
psi(0)=1.
psi(1)=psi(0)-dx
endif
c for al=1. psi(0)=0. psi'(0)=1. , psi(1) = psi(0)+dx
if(al.eq.1.)then
psi(0)=0.
psi(1)=psi(0)+dx
endif
c for al=2. psi(0)=0. psi(1)= (1./2.)*dx**2*al
if(al.eq.2.)then
psi(0)=0.
psi(1)= psi(0)+ (1./2.)*dx**2*al
endif
do 100 i=2,nstep
x=dx*float(i)
psi(i)=dx**2*g(x-dx,i-1)+2.*psi(i-1)-psi(i-2)-(2.*dx/(x-dx))*
$(psi(i-1)-psi(i-2))
c print*,'e,g,psi(i)=',e,g(x-dx,i-1),psi(i)
100 continue
energy(iter)=e
psinf(iter)=psi(nstep)
e=e + de
110 continue
do 20 i=1,niter
print 120,energy(i)*escale,psinf(i)/abs(psinf(i))
20 continue
120 format(3x,'energy, psif/abs(psif)=',2(4x,e10.3))
print*,' '
c call plotwave(psi,nstep,50,dx)
print*,'more ? =1 another run , =0 no more'
more=0
c read*,more
if(more-0)130,130,135
130 stop
end
subroutine plotwave(psi,nstep,ns,dx)
dimension psi(0:5000)
do 10 i=0,nstep,ns
x=dx*float(i)
print 100 , x, psi(i)
10 continue
100 format(2x,'x,psi=', 2(4x,e11.4))
return
end
Second eigenfunction
Set E= -(1/2) (1/22 ) = -1/8 in the above code with psi(0)=1. , psi(0+∆x) = 1.

Fig 3. Ψ 2, 0,0 = Psi2s(r) = N ( 2-r)exp(-r/2).
To find the normalization constant integrate use again the definition ∫ { Ψ 2, 0,0 }2 4π r2 dr =1 .
A useful definite integral ,for this calculations , is ∫0∞ rn exp(-ar) dr = Γ(n+1)/ an+1 , or use a symbolic language e. g.
SAGE code
var('r');
f=( 2-r)*exp(-r/2);
integral(4*pi*r^2*f^2,r,0,oo)
32*pi .
This gives N2 32π = 1 , hence N = (1/(32π ))1/2 and
Ψ 2, 0,0 = (1/(32π ))1/2 ( 2-r)exp(-r/2) . (22)
Or one can select another choice of scale then as explained above , r → Z r , N → Z3/2 N , making
Ψ 2, 0,0 = (Z3/(32π ))1/2 ( 2-Zr)exp(-Zr/2) . (23)
To construct Ψ3,0,0 we may set E = -(1/2) (1/32 ) in our code and plot R(r) finding the roots, just as we did with Ψ 2, 0,0 .
However one may also obtain Ψ3,0,0 using the orthogonality conditions.
Let the un normalized Ψ3,0,0 be the polynomial of order (3-1) ,(with two constants a, b to be determined) ,
Ψ3,0,0 = (a + br + r2 ) exp(-r/3) . (24)
Then we get two equations for a and b ,
∫ Ψ3,0,0 Ψ 1, 0,0 r2 dr = 0 , (25)
var('r');f1=exp(-r);
f2=( 2-r)*exp(-r/2);f3=(a+b*r+r^2)*exp(-r/3);
integral(r^2*f1*f3,r)
The indefinite integral is ,
I 1,3 =
-3/32*(8*r^2 + 12*r + 9)*a*e^(-4/3*r) - 3/128*(32*r^3 + 72*r^2 + 108*r + 81)*b*e^(-4/3*r) - 3/128*(32*r^4 + 96*r^3 + 216*r^2 + 324*r + 243)*e^(-4/3*r) |
When evaluated at infinity it is zero and at the lower limit r=0 , the only contributing terms are those not proportional to powers of r, with the signs changed ,
I 1,3 = (27/32)a + (243/128)b + 729/128 = 0
I 2,3 = ∫ Ψ3,0,0 Ψ 2, 0,0 r2 dr = 0 . (26)
I2,3 = 3456/625*a + 108864/3125*b + 746496/3125
Solving the set of equations
(27/32)a + (243/128)b = - 729/128 , (27)
(27/32)a + (243/128)b = - 729/128 .
Gives a=27/2 b= -9 . So
Ψ3,0,0 ~ ( 27/2 - 9 r + r2 ) exp( -r/3) , or
Ψ3,0,0 = N ( 27- 18 r + 2 r2 ) exp( -r/3) . (28)
SAGE code
var('a,b');
#(27/32)a + (243/128)b + 729/128
# 3456/625*a + 108864/3125*b + 746496/3125
solve([(27/32)*a+ (243/128)*b==-729/128,
(3456/625)*a+(108864/3125)*b==-746496/3125],a,b)
[[a == (27/2), b == -9]]
From the normalization condition
∫ (Ψ3,0,0 )2 4π r2 dr = N2 ∫ ( 27- 18 r + 2 r2 )2 exp( -2r/3) 4π r2 dr
= N2 (19683 π) =1 .
Thus
Ψ3,0,0 = { 81(3 π) }-1/2 ( 27- 18 r + 2 r2 )2 exp( -2r/3) . (29)
Sage code
f=(81*3*pi)^(-1/2)*( 27- 18*r +
2*r^2)*exp( -r/3)
plot(f,r,0,20)

Fig 4. The normalized Ψ3,0,0 .
x,psi= 0.18963E+01 0.12123E-02
x,psi= 0.18975E+01 0.95576E-03
x,psi= 0.18987E+01 0.69960E-03
x,psi= 0.19000E+01 0.44378E-03
x,psi= 0.19013E+01 0.18829E-03
x,psi= 0.19025E+01 -0.66865E-04
x,psi= 0.19037E+01 -0.32168E-03
x,psi= 0.19050E+01 -0.57617E-03
x,psi= 0.19063E+01 -0.83031E-03
x,psi= 0.19075E+01 -0.10841E-02
x,psi= 0.71012E+01 -0.11241E-03
x,psi= 0.71025E+01 -0.67371E-04
x,psi= 0.71037E+01 -0.22344E-04
x,psi= 0.71050E+01 0.22666E-04
x,psi= 0.71062E+01 0.67661E-04
x,psi= 0.71075E+01 0.11264E-03
r1= 1.90190005
r2= 7.10430002
r1+r2 , r1*r2= 9.00619984 13.5116682
Series solution
By an argument similar to that used in the harmonic oscillator problem we factor the solution in (14) as a series times the exponential exp( -λ r) where , λ = {2 abs(E) }1/2 .
R = ( ∑p=0 ap rp + l ) exp( -λ r) ≡ v(r) exp(-λ r ) , ( 30 )
and seek a recursion relation for the coefficients ap , as well as a condition that will terminate the series making it a polynomial.
The derivatives are
R' =exp(-λ r ) { v' -λ v } ; R'' =exp(-λ r ){v'' -2λv' +λ2 v } . (31)
Equation (14) with μ=1 is ,
( ∂2 /∂r2 +(2/r) ∂ /∂r ) R( r) - l(l+1) R(r) /r2 +2 (E - U(r) ) R (r) = 0 , (32)
Since 2 E = -(2abs(E) ) = - λ2 , U(r) = -1/r eq(32) is rewritten as
∂2 /∂r2 +(2/r) ∂ /∂r ) R( r) - l(l+1) R(r) /r2 - λ2 R +(2/r) R = 0 . (33)
Substitution in (33) and cancelling the factor exp(-λ r ) yields ,
{ v'' -2λv' +λ2 v} + {2v'/r - 2λv/r} - l(l+1) v /r2 -λ2 v +(2/r)v = 0 . (34)
Notice that the term λ2 v is canceled.
Introduce now the series v(r)= ∑p=0 ap rp + l , remember l is the angular momentum quantum number and the leading power at the origin. Differentiating v(r),
v' = ∑p=0 (p + l )ap rp + l -1 , v'' = ∑p=0 (p + l ) (p + l -1 )ap rp + l -2 . (35)
Omitting the summation sign in (34) ,there will be six terms ,
(p + l ) (p + l -1 )ap rp + l -2 -2λ (p + l )ap rp + l -1 +2(p + l )ap rp + l -2 -2λ ap rp + l-1 - l(l+1) ap rp + l-2 +2ap rp + l-1 =0 . (36)
Relabeling the dummy index p → p-1 in the terms proportional to rp + l -2 leads to all terms having the power rp + l -1 , leading to the recursion formula
ap+1 = 2{ λ(p+l +1) -1} ap / [ (p+l+1)(p+l+2) - l(l+1) ] . (37)
The series terminates in a polynomial of order (p+l) if the coefficient { λ(p+l +1) -1} = 0. In consequence the unknown parameter
λ = 1/(p +l +1) . (38)
Introduce the principal quantum number nprincipal = p + l + 1. The principal quantum number adds the maximum quantum number p ( which can also be labeled nr )
and the angular momentum number l, plus one.
( 2 abs(E) )1/2 = 1/nprincipal . (39)
Then abs(E) = 1/(2 n2 ) , or since E<0 , as we anticipated ,
E = -1/(2 n2 ) , (n=1,2,3,...) . (40)
Example :
example a) set n=1 , then since n=1= nr + l +1 , both nr = 0 , l = 0.
So Ψ1,0 ,0 ~ r0 exp(r) and N2 ∫ exp(-2r) 4π r2 dr = 1.
N = [ π ]-1/2 and
Ψ1,0 ,0 (r) = (1/π)1/2 exp (-r) .
example b)set n=2 . 2 = nr + l +1 , (λ =1/2) then one possibility is nr = 1 , l =0 , m=0 ~ Ψ2 ,0 ,0 .
From (37) a1 = ( -a0 )/2 . And Ψ2 ,0 ,0 ~ (-r/2 +1) a0 exp(-r/2) which has to be normalized .Comparing with eq(22)
Ψ 2, 0,0 = (1/(32π ))1/2 ( 2-r)exp(-r/2) we see that it is the same . The root ,of course, is the same at r = 2.
Consider now the case n=2 but with nr = 0 , l=1 ( m= 0 , +1,-1) .
For n=2 , l=1 ,m= 0 one has Ψ2 ,1 ,0 ~ a0 rl exp(-r/2) Pm=0 l=1 ( θ ) exp( i m φ ) , for Plm (θ ), see the Table of associated Legendre functions in chapter 7,
~ a0 r exp(-r/2) cos ( θ )
The normalization will determine a0 .
∫ (Ψ2 ,1 ,0 )2 r2 dr sinθ dθ dφ = (a0 )2 ∫ r4 exp(-r) dr ∫ cos(θ)2 sin(θ) dθ ∫ dφ =1
= (a0 )2 ( 24) (2/3) (2π ) =1,
hence a0 = 1/( 32π )1/2 . Finally
Ψ2 ,1 ,0 = { 1/( 32π )1/2 } r exp(-r/2) cos( θ ) . (41)
The wave functions Ψ2 ,1 ,1 , Ψ2 ,1 ,-1 have the same r dependence as Ψ2 ,1 ,0 , the difference is in the θ and φ dependence. For example ,
Ψ2 ,1 ,1 ~ r exp(-r/2) Pl=1m=1 (θ) exp(+i φ ) ,
~ r exp(-r/2) sin(θ) exp(+i φ ) . (42)
The normalization is N2 ∫ r4 exp(-r) dr ∫ {sin(θ)}3 dθ ∫ dφ =1 .
Hence N2 (24) ( 4/3 ) (2π) = 1 ;
and N = 1/( 64 π )1/2 . Therefore
Ψ2 ,1 ,1 = {1/( 64 π )1/2 } r exp(-r/2) sin(θ) exp(+ i φ ) , (43)
Ψ2 ,1 ,-1 = {1/( 64 π )1/2 } r exp(-r/2) sin(θ) exp(- i φ ) . (44)
example c) set n=3 . nr + l +1=3 , (λ =1/3) build Ψ3 ,0 ,0 . Thus , nr = 2 , l =0 and m=0 .
From (37) a1 = -(2/3) a0 , or simply a1 = -(2/3) .
a2 = 2/27
So Ψ3 ,0 ,0 ~ { (2/27)r2 -(2/3)r + 1 } exp(-r/3) or ~ { 2r2 -18r +27 } exp(-r/3) (see eq. (29) ) .
Normalizing we have ,
N = [ ∫ { 2r2 -18r +27 }2 exp(-2r/3) 4π r2 dr ] -1/2
= [19683*pi ]-1/2 = 1/( 39/2 π1/2 )
SAGE code (see ref. 10)
r=var('r')
f=(2*r^2-18*r+27)^2*exp(-2*r/3)
integral(f*4*pi*r^2,r,0,oo)
and
Ψ3 ,0 ,0 = (1/81) ( 1/(3 π)1/2 ) { 2r2 -18r +27 } exp(-r/3) . (44)
Problem: Derive an expression for the averages , <r>1,0,0 , <r>2,0,0 <r>2,1,0 <r>2,1,1 . (see ref 2. chapter V)
<r>1,0,0 = ∫ r ( Ψ1 ,0 ,0 )2 4π r2 dr = 3/2 . (45)
SAGE code
r=var('r')
psi=(1/pi^(1/2))*exp(-r)
integral(r*psi^2*4*pi*r^2,r,0,oo)
3/2
<r>2,0,0 = ∫ r ( Ψ2 ,0 ,0 )2 4π r2 dr = 6 . (46)
SAGE code
r=var('r')
psi(r)=(1/(32*pi)^(1/2))*(2-r)*exp(-r/2)
integral(r*psi(r)^2*4*pi*r^2,r,0,oo)
<r>2,1,0 = ∫ r ( Ψ2 ,1 ,0 )2 r2 dr sin(θ) dθ dφ
= 5 (47).
<r>2,1,1 = ∫ r ( Ψ2 ,1 ,1 )2 r2 dr sin(θ) dθ dφ = 5 . (48)
Sage code
r,theta=var('r,theta')
Rad(r)=(1/(64*pi)^(1/2))*r*exp(-r/2)
P(theta)=sin(theta)
integral(r*Rad(r)^2*r^2,r,0,oo)*integral(P(theta)^2*sin(theta),theta,0,pi)*2*pi
5
Comparing (47)-(48)
with (46) we see that the angular momentum l ≠ 0 brings
the electron closer to the nucleus.
The general result ( see ref 2.) for
the average radial position is depends on n and l and is given
by ,
<r>n,l, m = (3/2)(n2/Z) - l(l+1)/(2Z) ( 49 )
FORTRAN code for the coefficients of the hydrogenic radial wave function
c coeff hydrogenic radial wave functions
real lambda
dimension a(0:10)
a(0)=1.
5 print*,'anprinc , al? '
read*,anprinc , al
print *,'radial polynomial is of degree anprinc-1=',anprinc-1.
print*,'leading term is a0*r**(l)'
print*,' '
ifinal=int(anprinc)-1
lambda=1./anprinc
do 10 i=1,ifinal
p=float(i-1)
a(i)= a(i-1)*(2.*lambda*(p+al+1.) -2.)/( (p+al+1.)*(p+al+2.)
$-al*(al+1.) )
10 continue
do 20 i=0,ifinal
print 100,i ,a(i)
20 continue
100 format('i,a(i)=',i3,3x,e12.5)
stop
end
END OF CHAPTER